A woman who was told by her boss to not ‘let the hormones get out of control’ has won an age discrimination tribunal against her employers.
Louise McCabe, 57, received the comment from 29 year old company CEO Jack Williams during a heated discussion between the two.
The tribunal heard Williams viewedย older peopleย as “not familiar” with the IT sector, and thought of McCabe as a “menopausal woman”.
McCabe was stripped of her role as company director at e-commerce firm Selezar, where she was a shareholder and founding director in 2014.
She was placed onย gardening leaveย and eventually fired after raising concerns with Williams about how members of staff were being treated – which the tribunal concluded was the main driving force behind them asking her to leave.
A younger replacement was requested by her boss
Williams told a recruitment consultant to find “a younger team member who was more in tune with a young tech start company” for the finance department.
Matt Jenkin, employment specialist at law firm Moorcrofts, said thatย age discriminationย is just one of many claims the company may face.
He toldย HRย magazine: “The comments made by the CEO do show that age discrimination is still an issue in the workplace with outdated and misinformed views on older people – andย older women particularlyย – still a part of some employers thinking.
“With the remedy hearing listed for October 2022 it is likely, particularly given that age discrimination was only one of the many claims that Mrs McCabe was successful, that the company in this case will face a hefty financial penalty for its actions.”
McCabe has successfully sued the company for age discrimination and unfair dismissal. She also had claims for breach of contract, unlawful deduction of wages, and detrimental treatment for making protective disclosures.
Age discrimination is still rife
Jess Kuehne, senior programme manager for ageism at the Centre for Ageing Better, said that the case represents the ageism that still exists within workplaces.
She toldย HRย magazine: “This ruling is a clear and reassuring reminder that age discrimination is completely unacceptable in the workplace โ or anywhere else for that matter. Ageism is sadly still rife in the workplace, and the extent of its negative impact on employees who encounter it is still very much underestimated.
โThe instructions for the recruitment company to look for aย younger personย to replace Mrs McCabe is indicative of the systemic ageism that is still so deeply engrained amongst some employers. The notion that older people are inherently unfamiliar with technology is a lazy stereotype โ and one which has serious impacts.
Mind your language
Kuenhe added that businesses should steer away from language that makes assumptions about older workers when recruiting.
She added: โWe recommend employers to avoid age-biased language, such as โtech savvyโ or โrecent graduateโ in their adverts. Instead, they need to challenge any assumptions they have about older workersโ skills to attract a wider pool of applicants. And itโs worth it โ research has shown that a firm with a 10% higher share of workers aged 50 and over is 1.1% more productive.”
Ageism in Recruitment: why we need to change the way we think
