• Covid-19 – click here for the latest updates from Forum Events & Media Group Ltd

  • Slider

    PA Life PA Life PA Life PA Life PA Life


    Has the pandemic turned back the clock on gender equality?

    • 0

    By Aleksandra Traczyk, Solicitor at Winckworth Sherwood

    Not long into the start of the pandemic gender equality commentators warned about the potential disproportionate impact on women. One year on, we now have statistics to back them up. The report published by the Women and Equalities Committee on 9 February and data from the Office for National Statistics published on March 10th have shown that more women than men have been adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Women’s employment was found to be more vulnerable than men’s for a number of reasons, including because women tend to be overrepresented in industries that are most likely to be affected by the pandemic; such as hospitality and retail. They also tended to be on less secure or flexible contracts and earned less than men as well as having taken on the bigger share of childcare and home-schooling responsibilities. A significant proportion of women made redundant during the pandemic mentioned that they thought their pregnancy, maternity leave or motherhood was a factor in the decision to terminate their employment. For example; a survey by Pregnant Then Screwed last year revealed that 53% of pregnant women believe their pregnancy was a factor in their redundancy decision while 61% believed that their maternity leave was a factor.

    Redundancy
    The pandemic has resulted in a significant rise in redundancies and the rate of female redundancy has increased at a higher rate than that of male redundancy as reported by the Equality and Human Rights Commission last year. The pre-pandemic trend was already not encouraging in that pregnancy and maternity discrimination has, it appears, been on the increase in the last 10 years.

    Pregnancy and maternity are protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010 and it is discriminatory to treat an employee unfavourably because of her pregnancy, pregnancy-related illness or because she has taken or sought to take maternity leave. Selection of an employee for redundancy because she is pregnant or on maternity leave will also be an automatically unfair dismissal.

    Currently, women are entitled to (slightly) more favourable treatment if they are to be made redundant whilst on maternity leave, namely that they have to be offered any suitable available vacancies ahead of their colleagues. However, employers have simply been waiting until they return from maternity leave before making them redundant.  Accordingly, the Government has committed to extending this protection to six months after the end of the maternity leave as part of the Employment Bill originally announced in December 2019. The Committee recommended that the Bill is published by the end of June 2021 at the latest.

    Former chair of the Committee, Maria Miller MP, has called for legislation to make it automatically unfair to dismiss an employee by reason for redundancy if the dismissal occurs during pregnancy, maternity leave, or the six-month period after the end of maternity leave – thus removing the need for causative connection between the pregnancy and the dismissal. Similar protection is already used in Germany.

    Childcare has also been found to be a significant factor in redundancy. Employers should be aware to the risk of indirect sex discrimination claims, if they make a female employee redundant or otherwise terminate employment essentially because of childcare issues.

    Flexible working
    Women are also more likely to submit flexible working requests then men. Presently, the minimum length of service required before an employee may submit a flexible working request to their employer is 26 weeks. The Committee recommended that this becomes a ‘Day One’ right. Current arrangements can trap women into working for the employer with whom they have managed to negotiate a reasonable working arrangement, thus impeding a more gender-equal economic recovery. The Government has also committed to making flexible working the default position as part of the upcoming Employment Bill. When considering flexible working requests, employers should be aware of indirect sex discrimination claims if they refuse such requests, as women tend to take on the bigger share of childcare responsibilities.

    Gender pay gap
    The pandemic has also likely widened the gender pay gap significantly. Enforcement of gender pay gap reporting requirements on employers with more than 250 employees was suspended for the 2019/2020 financial year. Pre-pandemic statistics have shown that women were already less well paid then men. For that reason, during the pandemic, they were more likely to ask to be furloughed to take on the home-schooling and/or childcare responsibilities. Employers should continue gathering the relevant data for pay gap reporting and could face equal pay claims if they pay less to their female employees who perform equal work to their male counterparts.

     

  • Slider
  • Avatar
    AUTHOR

    Lisa Carter

    All stories by: Lisa Carter